Logo Die Sachsen News
News / Politics

How extensively can the government be questioned? Court examines

How extensively can the government be questioned? Court examines
Constitutional Court examines the right to ask questions in parliament. (Archive photo) / Photo: Jan Woitas/dpa
From: DieSachsen News
1,090 questions on data protection: the left-wing parliamentary group wants to know exactly, but the Ministry of the Interior is blocking it. Now the Constitutional Court is deciding how extensive questions to the government can be.

Saxony's Constitutional Court in Leipzig has dealt with the right of parliamentary groups in the Saxon state parliament to ask questions. Specifically, it dealt with a major question on data protection submitted by the left-wing parliamentary group in December 2023 with a total of 1,090 questions. The Left Party wanted to know how the Free State uses registration data and what precautions it takes to protect it. The Ministry of the Interior refused to answer due to the scope of the questions. Following the Left's complaint, it is now up to the Constitutional Court with the so-called Organstreit proceedings.

More from this category

Core question: What does brief and specific mean?

The Saxon constitution stipulates that major interpellations must be formulated "briefly and specifically" and answered by the state government "to the best of its knowledge without delay and in full". If an answer is refused - for example due to confidentiality obligations or because the rights of third parties are infringed - this must be justified in a comprehensible manner. In addition, a major interpellation must not impair the state government's ability to work.

In the present case, the question is what "brief and specific" means, said the President of the Constitutional Court, Matthias Grünberg, at the hearing. "There are no rigid limits to this." Research had shown that extensive inquiries with more than 600 questions had been answered in the past.

President of the state parliament had examined the major enquiry

The president of the state parliament at the time had examined the specific inquiry and had no reservations. For the state parliament administration, "short and specific" refers to the general question and not to the number of questions, explained representatives of the institution at the hearing. The content-related deficiencies and the general competence of the state government would be examined.

State government: ability to act would be impaired

The representative of the state government had argued that the effort required to answer the questions would have been so high that it would have impaired the state government's ability to act. Moreover, the possibility of answering only individual questions had not arisen. Extending the deadline by a few weeks would not have helped either.

The Constitutional Court did not reach a decision after the hearing. It intends to announce a date for the pronouncement at a later date.

Copyright 2026, dpa (www.dpa.de). All rights reserved

The translations are automated with the help of AI. We look forward to your feedback and your help in improving our multilingual service. Write to us at: language@diesachsen.com.
Sachsen News
Article from

Sachsen News

Sachsen News is responsible for the content itself. The platform's code of conduct applies. The platform checks and treats content in accordance with the legal requirements, in particular the NetzDG.

Social Media